An Interview with Sandra Solomon – Dr. Bill Warner

Sandra Solomon is a former Muslim, raised in Saudi Arabia, who now lives in Canada. We talked with her about:
• Being an apostate
• How Canadian hate speech laws affect her
• What it is like to wear the black robes in the heat
• Child brides
• Rape of female servants
• What it is like to see the West while living in a Sharia nation
What you discover from her answers is that Muslims follow the Islamic doctrine, just as it is laid out in the Koran and the Sunna of Mohammed.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Some walls are OK, but not our’s?

racist-wall-750.jpg

Image | Posted on by | Leave a comment

An Emasculated Culture in a Fema-Nazi Society – BATR

feminism.jpg

An Emasculated Culture in a Fema-Nazi Society

Only those who have been existing under a rock are unaware of the integral destruction of Western Civilization and fundamental values that mark the last several decades. After the endless warnings and documentation provided by some of the most perceptive thinkers of the last several generations, society ignores and even condemns the factual record of this cultural path into oblivion. What has emerged is a disturbed mental insanity that demands total allegiance to a deranged political correctness. While it is evident that the genetic traits of the heinous descendants of Eve have formed the vanguard of this macabre authoritarian mindset, the decisive responsibility for allowing and furthering this spiteful temperament, rests upon the cowardly male gender that lost the courage to hold feminists accountable for their demented state of mind.

When a civilization abdicates the inherent reality of facts, the elimination of truth soon follows. The mass popular practice of establishing a singular purity of thought is promoted as having a savoir-faire that will root out old customs of conduct and replace it with a wholesomeness of adherence to a Hippolyta, queen of the Amazons society. How quaint, to watch the inane poppycock that purports to pass for social commentary in the decadent media. If your tolerance for such drivel has long ago hit the saturation point, it becomes imperative that confronting these debilitated schizoids and refuse to accept their validity as a thinking and balanced person.

The relative ease by which totalitarian conformity is swallowed by the lethargic public is appalling. Free Speech can be abolished at Berkley, while Nazi thugs practice a 21th century version of book burning. Bill O’Reilly can be ushered out of the most watched cable news/political program with not so much as a farewell. The Fox wimp siblings must succumb to the advertiser invertebrates to satisfy the demands of the collectivist opposition. And when the gutless GOP Congress allows the Progressive Gestapo to force their Globalist Marxism agenda, the minority becomes the veto proof stalwart band of state religion.

Now not all is lost. There are a few shining stars in the ferment of black holes. Now that Don Rickles has vacated the throne of “Mr. Warmth”, the indomitable Katie Hopkins is set to be crowned as the queen of mean. A gal who slings the venom of truth has a warm spot in the heart of every red blooded male.

On feminism:

“Women don’t want equal treatment, they couldn’t handle it if they got it. It’s a tough world out there. What a lot of women are actually looking for is special treatment. What women need to realise is that they have to toughen up.”

If you are in the camp of the sycophants, who believe that celebrates or media personalities are credible opinion makers, you need to check your meds. Watching a few minutes of the Joy BS on the View, or the fake news on CNN, or the delusional Mr. Maddow on MSNBC; does not provide a welcoming platform for the raw veracity that a Katie Hopkins can generate.

Even viewing the FAUX stable of bimbos and pseudo commentary “experts”, one takes away that the boundary line for discourse is severely limited to what is acceptable to Sarah and Kathryn Murdoch, than to their loyal audience, who knows that the heyday of fair and balanced has long passed away.

America has become a castrated culture ruled by a Femifascist society where “The average femanazi is a hypocritical dictator and a sexist. They tend to believe the male gender is conspiring against women and show no restraint in heaving up utter nonsense, which they refer to as ‘an argument’.”

With the utter destruction of academic integrity, institutions of higher learning have become asylums of electroshock therapy for integrating diminished government school graduates into the advanced treatment of producing social parasites. Public education is more damaging than communal isolation.

The example of a traditional social organization should alarm any sound thinking countryman. Tony Perkins argues, in Our Culture ‘Has Been Emasculated By Feminists And By The Left,’ Endangering Western Civilization.

“Tony Perkins, the president of the Family Research Council, joined “Breitbart News Daily” this morning, where he told host Alex Marlow that the Boy Scouts’ recent decision to allow transgender boys to join troops and policies allowing LGBT people to serve in the military are evidence that American culture “has been emasculated by the feminists and by the left,” to the detriment of western civilization.

Perkins told Marlow that the Boy Scouts of America was “designed, initially, to turn boys into men so that they could defend the country” but that “in this almost emasculated culture in which we live, that’s a thing of another era.”

He added that “those driving this agenda have an insatiable desire to radically transform America” and the Boy Scouts’ recent move “shows that this agenda is insatiable” and “cannot be appeased.”

Do not look to any Supreme Court to codify basic Bill of Right protections in this age of cultural relativity. With the decline in IQ measurement, “psychology professor, Jan te Nijenhuis at the University of Amsterdam, says Westerners have lost an average of 14 IQ points since the Victoria Era.” Add to this dumbing down of the masses, the debasement in the culture, and the prospects that a ruled society, will adopt living law accommodations and forgo the timeless principles of common law and inherent autonomy.

For an insight review The Modern Feminist Rejection of Constitutional Government.

“Those within the modern feminist movement frequently speak the language of equal opportunity and rights, but what they are really seeking is absolute parity between the sexes in all areas of society. This view is based both on a monolithic view of what it means to be an autonomous woman, and on the belief that discriminatory socialization, power imbalances within the family and society as a whole, and pervasive gender-based violence (which both results from and reinforces power imbalances) have created a social, economic, and political system that is inherently hostile to women. On these grounds, the modern feminist movement is less interested in protecting individual freedom and rights than it is in fundamentally transforming the American public consciousness and America’s political and private institutions.”

For those that see this assessment as an affront to feminism, you may not have a proper understanding of basic human rights. Examine 10 Winning Arguments Against Radical Feminism.

1) Feminism has nothing to do with gender equality.

2) Gender isn’t a social construct.

3) Gender roles are freely chosen (or freely rejected).

4) Women are not paid less for the same work, and equal pay legislation would backfire.

5) The patriarchy is doing a terrible job of privileging men.

6) Without capitalism, there would be no feminism.

7) Feminism oppresses clueless young men.

8) Rape culture is a radical Muslim thing.

9) Defending the 2nd Amendment should be feminists’ No #1 Priority.

10) Anti-feminist women are the ultimate individualists.

How did such an absurd and extreme perversion of defining female superiority in a world of male historic accomplishment come about? Easy when you tear down the pillars of an objective achievement society and replace it with a female victimhood and an irrational egotistical dominate pretense. In essence, Feminism Is a Hate Group, “When some of the most prominent feminists and famous women make openly hateful anti-male statements, and the mainstream feminist organizations say and do nothing to distance themselves from such public statements, then it’s clear that the hatred of men has an accepted place in mainstream feminism.”

(Source)

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Are the US Navy Carrier Fleets Obsolete?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Wages of Pathological Altruism

The Wages of Pathological Altruism

Here’s what I know about Kori Ali Muhammad:

First off, he’s black. He can’t shut up about it. He’s one of those latter-day American blacks who has his head so far up his ass sniffing his blackness, he fails to see all the sunshine this white world has to offer him. Even Hitler wasn’t as obsessed with being Aryan as Kori is with being black. After all, every once in a while, Hitler ate vegetables and played with his dog.

Last summer, Kori praised the black killer of five white police officers in Dallas, claiming in the inimitable all-caps style of the ideological psychopath that “HE LOVED US ENOUGH TO KILL AND DIE FOR US.” Ripping a page from the moronic Nation of Islam doctrine that white people were created by an evil black scientist named Yakub, he warned on Facebook that natural disasters would soon wreak ecological terror on the sons of Yakub:

DEADLY CATACLYSMIC NATURAL DISASTERS STRIKING yakubs grafted white devils and their kind GLOBALLY….MEGA DEADLY CATACLYSMIC HEATWAVES STRIKING yakubs grafted white devils and their kind….Black warriors mount up and ride out.

Kori Muhammad filmed himself laughing at the idea that melanoma would wipe out the white race. An aspiring rapper—aren’t they all?—he recorded a song about how the grafted white devil skunks would meet their maker soon.

“I wonder if, during that awful split-second before he got shot, it occurred to him that maybe ‘Nazis’ weren’t the biggest threat to him and his family.”

According to police in Fresno, CA, on Thursday, April 13, Muhammad shot and killed a Motel 6 security guard because, in Muhammad’s own words, the guard “disrespected” him. A Fresno news station describes shooting victim Carl Williams as white, but I think they need new glasses.

Police say that Muhammad told them that after killing Williams, he went into hiding to perform voodoo rituals. Last Tuesday, after going online at a local Starbucks and learning that he was the prime suspect in Williams’s murder, Muhammad made a decision—he was going to kill as many white men as possible, because that’s much more glorious than going down in the history books as merely as the killer of a Motel 6 security guard.

Armed with a gun and roaming through Fresno looking for white men to slay, Muhammad reportedly chanced upon a Pacific Gas and Electric Co. truck. Seeing that the driver was Hispanic, he instead chose to shoot and kill the white passenger, Zack Randalls.

Muhammad kept walking and then allegedly fired two rounds at another white man, missing him.

He then fired at a car but stopped the moment he realized its passengers were two Hispanic women.

Hunting for more white men, he found 37-year-old father of two Mark Gassett, shot him to the ground, and then stood over him and shot twice more, killing him.

His last victim was a fifty-eight-year old white man who’d gone to a local church for a free meal from Catholic Charities. Muhammad allegedly murdered him in the church’s parking lot.

Police apprehended Muhammad before he could kill anyone else, and he reportedly shouted, “Allahu Akbar!” upon being arrested. (He would later tell police he hadn’t been to a mosque in years and actually worshiped seven gods—primarily Aguna, a serpent-mother goddess from the Solomon Islands.)

According to Fresno police chief Jerry Dyer, Muhammad has confessed to all four killings and was quite frank about his motive:

This is a hate crime based on race and gender….If in fact he’s lashing out at white people—white males in this case—that would constitute a hate crime….We believe it is a hate crime, definitely a hate crime….He’s not a terrorist….But he is a racist.

Obviously not the brightest bulb on the Kwanzaa tree, Muhammad called Fresno’s CBS Eyewitness News from jail to confess to both the crimes and his motive:

Someone has to fight for all the people who died at the hands of racist white men….I was actually going to turn myself in, then I started thinking about the missing black women, and children, started thinking about Flint, Michigan, started thinking about [the] crack cocaine epidemic, started thinking about the injustices and atrocities my people go through. That’s why I snapped.

Surprisingly, even outlets such as the Los Angeles Times and CNN are admitting that the murders were racially motivated. Unsurprisingly, CNN ran an editorial claiming that, OK, hey, after giving it some thought, maybe this whole idea of “hate crimes” is a bit silly since you can’t prove someone’s murders were racially motivated, and, y’know, murder is already a crime, so no need to go charging this guy with a hate crime, because that would be unnecessary and kinda dumb.

Flabbergastingly, a CBS outlet in Sacramento decided to tiptoe over the fact that a black male had just admitted killing white men because he hated them to instead focus on shocking allegations that Muhammad’s family was being racially harassed in the wake of the killings.

(Source)

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

President Trump Has a Video Conference with NASA Astronauts Aboard the International Space Station

Super Cool! I have been pondering a question – do astronauts get to vote in Elections?  There’s actually an answer to this:

NASA astronaut Shane Kimbrough is off the planet at the moment, but he still had his say in this year’s presidential election.

Kimbrough, commander of the current Expedition 50 aboard the International Space Station (ISS), was able to vote from orbit thanks to procedures put in place by Texas legislators in 1997. (Most NASA astronauts live in the Lone Star State; Johnson Space Center, the hub of NASA’s human spaceflight program, is in Houston.) [Watch: How Astronauts Vote from Space]

The “voting process starts a year before launch, when astronauts are able to select which elections (local/state/federal) that they want to participate in while in space,” NASA officials wrote in a Tumblr post recently. “Then, six months before the election, astronauts are provided with a standard form: the ‘Voter Registration and Absentee Ballot Request — Federal Post Card Application.'”

When astronauts get their absentee ballots, their address is listed as “low-Earth orbit,” said Kate Rubins, who wrapped up a nearly four-month stint aboard the space station late last month.

NASA astronaut Shane Kimbrough, pictured here moments after arriving at the International Space Station on Oct. 21, 2016, has cast his absentee ballot for the 2016 presidential election from space, according to NASA officials.
NASA astronaut Shane Kimbrough, pictured here moments after arriving at the International Space Station on Oct. 21, 2016, has cast his absentee ballot for the 2016 presidential election from space, according to NASA officials.

Credit: NASA

Mission Control at JSC beams a digital version of these absentee ballots up to ISS crewmembers, who fill them out and send them back down. The ballots then go directly from Mission Control to the voting authorities, JSC officials have said.

Both Kimbrough and Rubins used this system to vote from the ISS this fall, NASA officials said.

NASA astronauts began voting from space in 1997, three years before people started living and working aboard the ISS. The first American to cast his ballot from orbit was David Wolf, who did so while aboard the Russian space station Mir, NASA officials have said.

In 2004, Leroy Chiao became the first NASA astronaut to vote from space in a presidential election. He was commanding Expedition 10 aboard the ISS at the time.

“I think it’s pretty amazing,” Rubins said in late October during an interview for NASA’s weekly “Space to Ground” ISS update. “It’s very incredible that we’re able to vote from up here, and I think it’s incredibly important for us to vote in all of the elections.”

Kimbrough currently shares space on the ISS with cosmonauts Sergey Ryzhikov and Andrei Borisenko. The trio will soon be joined by NASA astronaut Peggy Whitson, cosmonaut Oleg Novitskiy and European Space Agency astronaut Thomas Pesquet, who are scheduled to launch toward the orbiting lab on Nov. 17.

http://www.space.com/34643-how-nasa-astronauts-vote-from-space.html

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Hans-Hermann Hoppe on migrant crisis, USA, Germany, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Israel and more

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

THE MUSLIM QUESTION

The Muslim Question

It is a standard motif in Western (Cowboy) novels and movies. A cowboy is shot, and before healing can begin, the bullet must be removed. Once the projectile is obtained, the wound is sterilized and cauterized. Soon, the Cowboy is back on his feet, ready to take on the bad guys.

Western Culture has a similar scenario that plays out repeatedly. In this analogy, the bullets are Muslim attacks. The “bad guys” are the Muslims themselves. Most of us from the West, unfortunately, have short memories and little historical awareness. Our “enemy” in the 20th Century, at least in our memories, was Hitler and the Nazis (and their Japanese allies), and once they had been dispatched, the focus turned to the Soviets. Admittedly, there was much evil there, and it was certainly right to oppose them, but historically speaking, the major enemy the West has faced has been Muslim invaders, who systematically attacked Europe.

In the 21st Century, our attention has turned more to the Middle East, which necessitates a refocus on Muslims. From the very beginnings of Islam in 632, it has used the sword to conquer, forcing enslaved populaces to convert to its evil religion or be subjected to second class status. While many of our fellow westerners may think this is a new thing, they could not be more wrong.

In the 7th Century, only about 40 years after Mohammed rounded up his first followers, the expansion began. Constantinople, the capital of the Christian Byzantine Empire was attacked. Providentially, the Muslim invaders were repulsed, suffering a devastating defeat. However, that did not end the attempts to overrun the West. Time and again, Islam tried to force itself upon the people of the Byzantine Empire, with varying levels of success. By the 9th Century, Byzantium began to gain the upper hand, and that lasted for a couple of centuries. However, internal decay led to a weakening of the Byzantine Empire and by the mid-15th Century, it was no more, finally overrun by the Muslims. Once Constantinople fell in 1453, Islam pushed northward into Europe. Only a valiant defense of Vienna, led by Jan Sobieski, stopped their advance.

While the Eastern portion of the Empire endured and survived for nearly a millennium, the Western portion was attacked as well. There, the Christians had less initial, but more lasting, success. The Muslims had conquered Northern Africa, long a part of the Roman Empire, during the same time period they had first begun assaulting Constantinople. By the early 8th Century, all of North Africa was under Islamic control, and they turned their attention to crossing Gibraltar into Spain, attacking in 711. Their first advances were successful, and the Muslim army moved through Spain and into France.

charles-martel-large

It was there that the previously victorious Muslims met The Hammer, Charles Martel, and  his Frankish army. This great leader stopped the advancement at the Battle of Tours (or Poiters), pushed the Muslims back into Spain, and preserved the bulk of Europe for Christianity and Western Culture. Spain itself served as the scene for ongoing conflict for the next several centuries, but Europe, as a whole, was saved.

All of the events in the above historical synopsis show one consistent component – the only thing that stopped Muslim invasion was force. Every single time that Islam invaded a region, they only stopped the advancement when met with a superior force. This conflict has been going on for nearly 1500 years. The short respite in the 20th Century was the aberration of history, not the norm. Once again, Islam is advancing on the borders of the West, and to pretend that it is not an invasion is ludicrous.

The invasion may, in some ways, be more subtle, rather than an outright military attack, but it is an invasion, nonetheless. The only thing, like before, that will stop it will be to meet it with overwhelming force.

Of course, the subtle attack calls for adaptations in our forceful response. For the first time, the West has invited the enemy inside the gates. This hearkens back to my original analogy. We must remove the offending projectile – the Muslim immigrants, refugees, etc.- from our midst. Once they are removed, that wound can begin to heal, and we can then face our enemy head on, rather than looking over our shoulders, wondering if an insurgent is about to stab us in the back, so to speak.

Muslims are not Men of the West, and they never will be. They are something else, and not anything we want or need.

The desert, where Muslims belong

To be clear – Muslims need to go home. They have no place in Europe, America, or anywhere else that lives according to Western Cultural Principles. As long as they are content to remain in their sand and tents, then we can leave them alone, as we have always done. If they attempt to infiltrate or attack our lands, people, or culture, then we must call forth our next Jan Sobieski or Charles Martel, and defeat them mercilessly. Drive them to the ocean and scatter their bones. There can be no other option. There will be no compromise or debate.

It is time for the Men of the West to call things for what they are. Muslims are invading our lands, and they must be repulsed. Our heritage, our culture, and the lives of our progeny demand it.

(Source)

Posted in Marxist-Commies, Muslims, Politics, Rights-Liberty, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

CONNECT THE DOTS: Look What Happened To Trump Right After Secret Meeting On Tarmac

The dots are slowly being connected regarding the Obama surveillance scandal and it’s not looking good for Barack. The evidence is mounting that there was a massive conspiracy to hurt President Trump.

On June 27th of 2016, Bill Clinton met secretly with Obama Attorney General Loretta Lynch at the Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport. This was a scandal that still has not been resolved.

Lynch did recuse herself from the Clinton email scandal but now it appears that the meeting wasn’t about whether Hillary would go to jail but much more insidious.

Because right after this meeting Loretta Lynch made her first FISA request to tap Trump’s phones. Let that sink in for a minute. Bill Clinton has a secret meeting with the one person in the world who can, all by herself, derail Trump’s campaign.

Which would have installed, not elected Hillary to the highest office in the land. Hillary Clinton would have become the most powerful person in the world. The Clinton cash machine would go on raking in the cash after all the warrants and subpoena’s get tossed in the garbage

What’s really interesting is the FISA request was denied. That court declined just 11 of the more than 33,900 surveillance requests made by the government over 33 years.

The FISA court has denied just .03% of all government FISA requests. That means Lynch’s request, which came after meeting with Bill Clinton, was a piece of garbage. It was a clear attempt to use the Justice department to go after a political opponent.

Fast forward to October 2016.  As the Presidential race tightened and Hillary started to panic, another request from the Obama admin to tap Trump’s phones was submitted to the FISA court.

This was granted because there was a story swirling around the liberal blogosphere about a computer server at Trump tower being linked to a Russian bank.

No evidence was found, the rumors unfounded, but the wiretaps continued. Andrew McCarthy of the National Review summed it up perfectly saying,

The Obama administration was monitoring an opposing presidential campaign using the high-tech surveillance powers of the federal intelligence services.

(Source)

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

American Indians Are Still Getting a Raw Deal

American Indians are the poorest of all of America’s ethnic groups. Why? After all, the government has granted them massive reservations and created entire agencies to look after them. Well, maybe that’s why. Naomi Schaefer Riley, author of “The New Trail of Tears,” explains.

Posted in Indians, Marxist-Commies, Uncategorized | Leave a comment